-
Wolfhawk’s Headphone/IEM Rankings
Wolfhawk’s Full-size Headphones Sound Quality Ranking List:
- JM Audio XTC-Open
- DCA Ether 2
- JM Audio XTC-Closed
- Rosson RAD-0
- Hifiman HE1000 v2
- Focal Utopia 2020
- Meze Empyrean
- Audeze LCD-X
- Kennerton Gjallarhorn GH 50 JM Edition v2
- Sony MDR-Z1R
- ZMF Aeolus Sapele
- Sennheiser HD 820
- Focal Celestee
- Audeze LCD-XC
- Mark Levinson 5909
- Focal Bathys
- B&W PX8
- Dali IO-6
- Focal Elex
- Hifiman HE400
- Shure Aonic 50
- Sennheiser Momentum over-ear wired
- AKG K702
- Sony WM-1000XM3
- Drop + Dan Clark Audio Aeon Closed X Headphones
- Bose 700
Wolfhawk’s IEM Sound Quality Ranking List:
- Multiverse Mentor Jade/Emerald
- Vision Ears Elysium – Bass Edition 1 of 1
- Noble Kublai Khan
- Aroma Audio Thunder
- FAudio Mezzo LE
- Vision Ears VE8
- Thieaudio Monarch Mk2
- UM MEST Mk2
- 64Audio u12t
- Empire Ears ESR Mk2
- JH Audio ROX
- Noble FoKus Mystique
- 64 Audio Duo
- Final A5000
- Symphonium Meteor
- TRUTHEAR HEXA
- Letshuoer EJ07
- Moondrop Blessing 2
- DUNU SA6
- 7Hz Salnotes Zero
- TRUTHEAR HOLA
- RAPTGO Hook X
- KZ x HBB DQ6S
- Hzsound Heart Mirror
- Moondrop KXXX
- KZ ZSN
- Moondrop Chu
Wolfhawk’s DAP Sound Quality Ranking List:
- Cayin N7
- A&K SP3K
- Shanling M6 Ultra
- iBasso DX240 w/ AMP 8
- Shanling M3 Ultra
- Fiio M11 Plus
-
Upcoming Reviews
The following are upcoming or in-progress reviews:
FIR VxV
JH Audio 16 Pro v2 Universal
HiBy RS8 w/ Dock
Cayin N7
Penon Impact
Kiwi Ears Orchestra Lite
Beyerdynamic DT 1990
Beyerdynamic Xelento
Campfire Audio Vega 2020
Campfire Audio Dorado 2020
Audeze Maxwell Gaming Headset
Sendy Aiva
Sony MDR-Z7m2
AKG K7xx
Mangird Xenns Up
Moondrop S8
Hidition Viento B
-
Astell&Kern A&Ultima SP3000
I’m Going To Get Hate Mail For This One
Pros: Beautiful Build Quality
Green Case Included!
Lots of Jacks
Good Power
Has TidalCons: Expensive
Sound tuning can be sharper than I like
Don’t like the UI – not really built for streaming
The button layout can be annoyingOverview:
Disclaimer: Yeah, I’m going to get hate mail for this review – inevitable any time you write a bad review of a $3,700 product. As always, I just write what I think, and I don’t really care if you don’t agree – write your own review. That said, this is just my opinion on a product I bought with my own money, and that doesn’t mean you won’t like it – you REALLY don’t need to write me telling me how you feel – I REALLY don’t care. Go listen to it for yourself, make your own opinions, agree with me, don’t agree with me, and write a review (the guy I sold this to has heard it before and likes it). I’m sponsored by no one and I’ve made $0 on this silly hobby. This DAP just so happened to do poorly on my grading criteria, maybe it’ll do well on yours. Cheers mate!Up for review today is the Astell&Kern (A&K) A&ultima SP3000 (SP3K) DAP. Yeah, that name is way too long and has far too many & signs and random letters. I’ve been putting this review off for quite some time because I’ve been going back and forth on this DAP for quite some time. More on that later, first, let’s talk about the DAP itself. The SP3k is the update to the…SP2k. Cool, at least that naming convention makes sense, unlike a LOT of companies’ naming conventions. So…what are you getting for your $3,700?
Build Quality / Design / Specs (15/20):
First off, the build quality is fantastic, though I don’t love the idea of having to apply a screen protector on the front and back yourself. It’s a pain and you’ll almost always get some piece of dust under the protector, giving you an obnoxious bubble. The body itself is really nice with that fancy 904L steel. The downside of being that it picks up fingerprints like glass. Luckily, there’s a case, but more on that under accessories.
The design is also nice and feels like a luxury product. The power/volume button/wheel is pretty great and protected by the body of the player so you don’t accidentally press it – at least in theory. In practice, it still sticks out enough that it’s pretty easy to hit on accident – it’s also a very easy button to press, so you’ll accidentally turn it on and off repeatedly when putting it into a pocket. Additionally, the buttons are on the opposite side of the power/volume button. That’s actually pretty annoying because if you’re pushing the volume button in to turn the screen on or off, you’re also probably hitting the stop/play button or the next/back button – that’s not a good design. Other than that, the design works well and I appreciate having the outputs on the top of the player so I don’t have to do goofy acrobatics when pulling it out of a pocket. Oh, and the power/volume button/wheel glows the color of whatever file quality you’re playing, so that’s cool – though mine stayed Red or Green most of the time for some reason (even when using MQA.) Points off for design since it wasn’t well thought out.
For the specs, the SP3K has independent Dual Audio Circuitry and the latest DAC with HEXA-Audio Circuitry structure – whatever that means. I guess it means it sounds really good – it also supports MQA, and Native DSD512, 32bit/768kHz with Roon and LDAC wireless. It also has Quick Charge 3.0 and a Qualcomm 665 with 8GB of DDR4 – although A&K insists on calling it the Qualcomm 6125, which is the same thing. This is the same flagship CPU you’ll find on…well…everything else. That includes the $400 Shanling M3 Ultra and just about every other modern DAP. What the Shanling M3 Ultra does not have are two AK4191EQs and four AK4499EXs. A&K doesn’t really mention the wattage output levels, so it’s tough to compare that to other DAPs.
Accessories (10/20):
The SP3K comes with just a few accessories – Top, bottom, and front/back protectors, a USB C cable, and a Green leather case. The only accessory worth talking about is the Green leather case – it’s made from French goats (and I love Green.) How are those different from U.S. goats? I have no idea. But apparently, they are fancy AF because a replacement case is $200. Odd because it looks a lot like the Shanling M6 Ultra case, which is only $40. So, those French goats are just really fancy. Once again, this is a luxury product with luxury product prices, but it’s the only nice accessory that comes with the SP3K. The Cayin N7, which is $1,700 cheaper comes with much nicer accessories including multiple adapters. The iBasso DX240 also comes with nicer accessories for almost $2,000 cheaper. Maybe make the body of the DAP out of a cheaper material and you’ll have money left over for an actual luxury experience when the buyer opens the box. But at least it came with a case.
Software / Setup / Ease of Use (5/20):
Hate it. The locked Android ecosystem just sucks. There’s a built-in Tidal app, that after you log into it doesn’t show your normal Tidal home screen, but some random stock version. To get to your music, you have to tap the symbol in the upper left corner and select My Collection, then, swipe left to get to your normal playlists, etc. It’s a pain and one that you don’t have to deal with on the N7 or M6U. Once you’ve logged in, you still have to go through 3 button presses to get to the built-in Tidal app, and while the normal Tidal app is downloadable and doesn’t have the interface issues the built-in does, it doesn’t work as well with the SP3K either – and then you have two Tidal apps.
So, not for streamers then. If you just put your music onto an SD card, you’ll have a better time of it since the built-in player is always the homepage. A&K went through all of the efforts of having MQA and allowing streaming, unlike the LP6, and it just feels like an afterthought – a bit of a bummer.
Performance / Sound (15/20):
The battery life on low gain is just mediocre – not amazing or even good. It’s about 8 hours, which is about as average as you get. It’s still likely capable of powering most full-size headphones though for a good amount of time. Just don’t expect to power a Susvara for 8 hours…or possibly at all, I still don’t know the balanced output wattage amount. It is nice to have a 2.5mm on here as well, but I can count on two fingers the number of IEMs I’m gotten that came with a 2.5mm cable stock.
OK, sound, if everything else is just OK, the sound must be great right? Just like everything else on the SP3K, that answer has caveats. My initial impression of the SP3k was sharpness. Over the next few days, the sound grew on me, but what I realized was that the SP3k is exceptionally detailed, with good resolution, and a very neutral sound. I personally prefer a warmer sound like the M6U, the DX240, and the N7 over the sound of the SP3K, but, that doesn’t mean that the SP3K is bad at all – in fact it’s extremely good, but it will highlight the weakness in your music very quickly. If you have a treble sensitivity like me, it may be best to avoid it. Keep in mind that a lot of people absolutely love this DAP, so keep in mind what you like when purchasing.
Comparisons / Price (3/20):
This is where I really think this DAP drops the ball. For less money, you can get the HiBy RS8, the Cayin N7, the iBasso DX320, etc. I prefer the sound of these and I definitely prefer the price. Without the space-ship steel body and the goat leather case, this feels like it should run about $2,000. But, for some people, the luxury touches make it worthwhile, and it’s definitely cheaper than the L&P LP6. I’m more of a function-over-form sort of person, so the luxury touches don’t do it for me. Also, the N7 has just as much luxury (other than the metal-glass body) with a sound signature I prefer, better accessories (although the Yellow case isn’t for me), and a sound signature I prefer – all for $1,700 less.
Conclusion:
Yes, some people love this DAP; yes, some people think the price is worth it; yes, that’s OK. I suggest that you go listen to one before you buy one – the cost of travel may be worth the difference between this and something cheaper. Just because I don’t love it, that doesn’t mean you won’t. Get the best you can afford, but make sure that you like the sound of the SP3K before you buy one!
Wolfhawk’s Rating: 48/100
-
Audeze LCD-XC
The Closed-Off Professional
Pros: Great Build Quality
Decent sound with a balanced cable
OK Imaging
FitCons: Accessories/cable
Sound without a balanced cable
Almost everything without a balanced cableOverview:
Up for review today is the famous Audeze LCD-XC 2021. The XC is the closed-back version of the X, which I also had on hand during this review and they meet the needs of the professional when compared to the higher-end LCD-2/3/4 lines, which are the Enthusiast level. They have “Ultra-Thin Uniforce™ diaphragms, Fazor waveguides, and powerful neodymium magnets to deliver extremely accurate and detailed sound. The sophisticated planar magnetic drivers achieve a high efficiency with low impedance.” So…yeah, there ya go – they’re Planars. But, how do they sound?
Side Note: I didn’t like these until I hooked them up to a balanced cable – it completely changed the sound coming out of them, so PLEASE use a balanced cable – that’s the first time I’ve ever had to write that in a review.
Accessories/Earpads/Eartips (2/10):
Meh. They came with…nothing really. Literally, there was a cable in the box. The ear pads are pretty nice though – comfy. They CAME with ear pads, but every over-ear should do that. Yes, I’m grasping at straws – I literally cannot give more than 2 points here because all it came with are decent ear pads and a foam-padded cardboard box.
Cable (2/10):
The stock cable sucks. I’m just going to be blunt here. The Sennheiser HD600 has a nicer cable and it’s ~$300. The 6.35mm cable included with this is tangly, has memory retention, and feels cheaper than the $20 cable I got off amazon. Also, based upon how much changing the cable from the stock to a 4.4mm balanced improved the sound, I can honestly say this is the first stock cable that I really think made the headphone worse – to the point of wanting to throw it away. At least it came with a cable…that’s the only positive thing I have to say about it. Replace immediately.
Build Quality/Comfort (10/10):
Redemption, thy name is build quality. These are built like a tank – they make the much lighter JM Audio XTC-C feel like toys. There are no creaks or cheaper feeling parts – all of the budget for these headphones went into build quality. The Carbon fiber ear cups are amazing and hard to scuff – really just a brilliantly engineered headphone – other than the weight.
Comfort is good – if a little heavy. No fit issues for me, though the clamp might be a bit much for some people. Isolation is really good, I can’t even really hear MYSELF talk, let alone anyone else. That’s pretty amazing.
Sound:
I don’t have any other closed-back full-size headphones on my desk at the moment to compare these to directly, so I’m having to go off memory. That said, I haven’t listened to another closed-back that sounds like these anyway, so it doesn’t really matter. I am powering these through Tidal HiFi at 45-50/100 volume on the stock unbalanced 6.35mm connection on low gain with the tube off from my Cocktail Audio HA500H DAC/AMP.
Side Note: Powering these from my Shanling M6 Ultra through a 4.4mm cable completely changed how these sound. There’s more bass, less sharpness, and better overall sound – completely different sounding headphones. Definitely get a balanced cable, either 4-pin XLR for a desktop or 4.4mm for a DAP or DAC/AMP (the Truthear SHIO is great for phones and has a 4.4mm.) This literally took these headphones from a dislike for me to a mostly-like – I’ve never encountered that before.
Looking at the Frequency Response Graph below from Crinacle, the LCD-X have almost no sub-bass, and muted mid-bass. The mids are pretty neutral until you hit the high-mids at which point there are some odd peaks and dips throughout the rest of the frequency band. I’ll be honest, this graph doesn’t really match up with what I hear below anyway, so it’s not that useful.
Lows (8/20):
I am starting off with the Mid-bass/Sub-bass test – I’m using David Guetta’s “I’m Good (Blue).” The bass drums in the intro have an OK impact, with a little extra reverb, but nothing offensive. The sub-bass is present, but definitely not strong – it definitely won’t be winning any awards for bass quantity. Also, I have to mention that the mids/highs on this song are painfully sharp/metallic for me, which is very uncommon as this song typically makes every headphone sound good, which is why I only test bass with it – so that’s odd. I’d take the XTC-C over the LCD-XC any day of the week on this song.
Up next is Demon Hunter’s “I Am A Stone,” which I use to test whether the bass is too strong and overwhelms the mids. Obviously, the bass won’t be too strong here and it’s not. It’s still there in the background, barely, but it most certainly doesn’t overwhelm the mids. The mids sound much better here than on the previous song – these are definitely not for bassheads, or even just people who like some bass in their songs (me.) Also, the metallic sound remains, but the detail is good and the soundstage is surprisingly large. I have to keep turning these down because they’re a bit painful for me.
Mids (12/20):
Weaving The Fate’s “The Fall” is a test song for guitars and vocals. The intro guitars actually sound really good. The distorted guitars don’t, they come across as very thin and metallic. The soundstage is pretty large for a closed back, but I can’t shake the feeling of thinness and tinniness. There’s just no body here. The vocals are fine, but they blur into the rest of the song far more than I’m used to on IEMs costing ¼ or ½ as much. The Sony MDR-Z1R and Sennheiser HD820 are both better and the XTC-C is significantly better from memory.
Staind’s “Something to Remind You” has clean electric guitars and wonderful vocals – this song tests the vocal quality and background noise. The clean guitars in the intro sound good once more, though I’m still getting that metallic sound. The vocals sound good, if a little flat. These are unsurprisingly the studio monitors of the closed-back world. I personally prefer a more fun sound with a bit more bass and a more 3D presentation. That said, this is probably one of the best songs for the LCD-XC.
To test classical instruments in the mids, I’m using The Piano Guys’ “Code Name Vivaldi.” The strings sound pretty good on the LCD-XC. I think classical is really where the LCD-XC shines more than anywhere else. The pianos sound wonderful and the bass instruments come across clearly and the detail here is very good. These are literally the full-size closed-back version of the Letshuoer EJ07 that I reviewed yesterday. It’s a bit surprising to hear very similar sound in both considering the size difference, though the LCD obviously has a bigger soundstage and better imaging.
Highs (10/20):
To test sibilance on headphones I use Panic! At The Disco’s “High Hopes. Sharper “S” sibilance is apparent if you listen for it in this song. The song itself is pretty rough also and comes across as sharp overall. I’ve never had the intro trumpets sound sharp before on headphones, so that’s new, and not great. The LCD-XC is better than quite a few headphones on the sibilance test, but worse than some as well, slightly above average here.
The first highs test song I’ll be using is Dream Theater’s “The Alien,” which I use to test and see if the cymbals/high-hats/snare can be clearly heard and distinguished from the rest of the music. Nope. I can hardly tell there are any cymbals or high-hats in this song at all – at least in the intro, it gets better during the guitar solo. Well below average. At least the guitar solo sounds good and the bass drums are decent.
Michelle McLaughlin’s “Across The Burren” is another of my favorite highs/sharpness test songs as it can easily sound painful on some headphones. The piano presentation is solid and definitely above average with no real sharpness on the high notes or the lower chords. This makes sense with how muted the treble is on these headphones. If you hate bass and treble, these will be good closed-backs for you in this price range.
Soundstage/Instrument Separation/Imaging (7/10):
I use MGMT’s “Time to Pretend” to test soundstage, instrument separation, and imaging. The soundstage, instrument separation, and imaging are all pretty decent here. That said, the synths in the intro at 0:18 are ROUGH – I had to immediately turn it down. These are some of the most confusing headphones I’ve ever listened to and the LCD-X is far more to my taste than the closed-back version as I don’t have any of the complaints that I do here with the weird sharpness throughout my entire test playlist.
Comparisons:
The only comparisons that matter besides multiple better-sounding cheaper IEMs (Final A5000, Truthear HEXA) are the JM Audio XTC-C, and to some extent the Focal Celestee. They’re the only closed-back full-size headphones even close to the price of the LCD-XC that I’ve heard. I’d take both of them over the LCD-XC. Now, both of those are significantly bassier headphones, so if you hate bass, don’t even consider them. The LCD-XC is the closest I’ve heard to studio tuning with very light bass. All three have good detail and decent soundstage considering they’re closed-backs. The XTC-C is the lightest followed closely by the Celestee – the build quality is the worst on the XTC-C though as it’s a small boutique company. The build quality is the best on the Celestee, followed closely by the Celestee. I’d rank all three by sound quality with the XTC-C as #1, followed by the Celestee, and #3 are the LCD-XC. At least the LCD-XC sounds decent with The Strokes and Franz Ferdinand. BTW, I’ll take the LCD-X over these also – though balanced cables narrow the gap.
Conclusion:
I’m confused by the LCD-XC since I’ve seen really good reviews of these. I don’t like them a ton, though a balanced connection makes them far better – I still have IEMs under $300 and under $100 I’d prefer over these. Sure, the soundstage/imaging isn’t as good on the IEMs, but the overall sound is better and more well-rounded. That said, I don’t know of very many cheaper full-size closed-back that you can get that will sound better than this. So, if you want the Audeze build quality, brand name, and carbon fiber cups over the JM Audio XTC-C, and you hate bass while needing a closed-back, then these are the headphones for you. Otherwise, get the XTC-C (better sound) or Celestee (better looks/build quality.) Please get a balanced cable though, I cannot stress enough how much this changes the sound quality – also a laid-back, warmer DAC/AMP will help as well.
Headphone Scoring (v3): Accessories / Earpads / Eartips (10 pts): 2 Cable (10 pts): 2 Build Quality/ Design / Comfort (10 pts): 10 Lows (20 pts): 8 Mids (20 pts): 12 Highs (20 pts): 10 Soundstage / Instrument Separation / Imaging (10 pts): 7 Total: 51 -
Audeze LCD-X
The Professional
Pros: Build Quality
Decent Mids
Decent Highs
Bass won’t overwhelm midsCons: Sub-par bass
Terrible accessories/cable
Needs balanced cable for best performanceOverview:
Up for review today is the infamous Audeze LCD-X 2020. This is the professional version of the LCD-2/3/4 series and as such costs less. It is also the open-back brother to the LCD-XC – though I prefer the sound of the X to the XC, which I think most people will agree that’s true with most open-backs. Just like the XC, thee come with “Ultra-Thin Uniforce™ diaphragms, Fazor waveguides, and powerful neodymium magnets to deliver extremely accurate and detailed sound. The sophisticated planar magnetic drivers achieve a high efficiency with low impedance.” So…planars. On with the review!
Accessories/Earpads/Eartips (2/10):
Just like with the XC, the accessories are Meh. They came with…nothing really. Literally, there was a cable in the box. The ear pads are pretty nice though – comfy. They CAME with ear pads, but every over-ear should do that. Yes, I’m grasping at straws – I literally cannot give more than 2 points here because all it came with are decent ear pads and a foam-padded cardboard box.
Cable (2/10):
The stock cable sucks. I’m just going to be blunt here. The Sennheiser HD600 has a nicer cable and it’s ~$300. The 6.35mm cable included with this is tangly, has memory retention, and feels cheaper than the $20 cable I got off amazon. Also, based upon how much changing the cable from the stock to a 4.4mm balanced improved the sound, I can honestly say this is the first stock cable that I really think made the headphone worse – to the point of wanting to throw it away. At least it came with a cable…that’s the only positive thing I have to say about it. Replace immediately.
Build Quality/Comfort (10/10):
These are great build quality. Very solid, and a little lighter than the XC. No carbon fiber cups like the XC has, but it obviously doesn’t need them with the open back. Keep in mind, the newer version actually removed 2/8 fazors, so the newer version has a different sound, and it’s not necessarily better. Look up comparisons between the two and pick the sound you want.
Sound:
I am running these off of a Cocktail Audio HA500H DAC/amp on low gain with tubes disabled on an unbalanced 6.35mm. I’m running these at around 40-45/100 volume. I don’t have a balanced cable to use with these, but if the LCD-XC is any indicator, a balanced cable will improve these exponentially.
Lows (8/20):
Starting off with the Mid-bass/Sub-bass test I’m using David Guetta’s “I’m Good (Blue).” These are not basshead headphones and the impact on the intro kick drums has a weird level of reverb – it sounds pretty unnatural. The sub-bass is decent quality, but low quantity. Bass is definitely not the strong suit of the LCD-X. That said, it’s not going to offend anyone I suppose, but it’s definitely not the highlight.
Up next is Demon Hunter’s “I Am A Stone,” which I use to test whether the bass is too strong and overwhelms the mids. Guess what? You can hear the bass in the background, but it definitely doesn’t overwhelm the mids here. The vocals and mid-strings are definitely the stars of the show here. They sound great, full-bodied, and clean. Great ability to not overwhelm here.
Mids (15/20):
Weaving The Fate’s “The Fall” is a test song for guitars and vocals. Yeah, this sounds great. The guitars come in really strong and the vocals are super clean and clear. You can easily tell the different layers of this song quite easily. Again, the bass is discernable but doesn’t overwhelm the mids which are the highlight of the song on the LCD-X. If I had any complaints here, it’s that the clean guitars sound a little flat compared to the dirty guitars.
Staind’s “Something to Remind You” has clean electric guitars and wonderful vocals. The LCD-X manages to pull off a good presentation on the vocals here. The clean guitar in the background sounds good as well, but the vocals feel like the highlight of this song. Better yet, you don’t lose out on the bass guitar like you can on some bass-light headphones. Mids are definitely where these headphones are at.
To test classical mids, I’m using The Piano Guys’ “Code Name Vivaldi.” Each instrument in this song is clearly represented with no bias one way or the other. Pianos, strings, and bass -they all play well together to present a good, if not top-tier, representation of this song.
Highs (16/20):
To test sibilance on headphones I use Panic! At The Disco’s “High Hopes. The intro trumpets are a bit sharp, which is unusual, but it’s only on higher volumes. There is a tad bit of sibilance, but nothing crazy, definitely towards the lower to mid-end of the spectrum.
The first highs test song I’ll be using is Dream Theater’s “The Alien,” which I use to test and see if the cymbals/high-hats/snare can be clearly heard and distinguished from the rest of the music. The highs here are more present than the XTC-O but worse than several lower-end IEMs. You can hear the cymbals, but just barely and there is little to no separation here between strikes with the drumsticks.
Michelle McLaughlin’s “Across The Burren” is another of my favorite highs/sharpness test songs as it can easily sound painful on some headphones. There is basically no sharpness in this song. It gets close to the edge occasionally, but there’s nothing bad enough to complain about here. It’s an overall good representation of the highs in this song.
Soundstage/ Instrument Separation (8/10):
Large soundstage – bigger than the XTC-O, good instrument separation – slightly better than the XTC-O, but just barely. The soundstage while playing Hogwarts Legacy was pretty epic on the LCD-X while on the XTC-O it’s more intimate.
Comparisons:
The LCD-X has a bigger soundstage than the XTC-O. The XTC-O has significantly more bass and slightly reduced highs. The XTC-O feels a little more ‘full’ sounding than the LCD-X, likely due to the increased low end and smaller soundstage. The XTC-O may actually be a little more difficult to drive since the volume on the 3.5mm with the LCD-X is slightly louder than the volume balanced on the XTC-O. The mids feel a little more pronounced and clear on the LCD-X than on the XTC-O. This comparison is very similar to the XTC-O vs RAD-0 comparison, which shouldn’t be surprising since Audeze and Rosson are related. The Rosson still has near-magical mids which the LCD-X gets close to but doesn’t quite share while the XTC-O still have some of the best lows available.
Conclusion:
Whether or not you get the LCD-X really comes down to your preferences. If you want a bigger soundstage and mids and highs are more your focus, then the LCD-X is tough to beat. It is relatively heavy and the cable, while functional, begs to be replaced by a more competent cable. It also pairs better with tube amps to give it a bit more warmth. The XTC-O and LCD-X don’t just share their love of acronyms, they are also very similar in design and performance – it’s up to you to decide what you prefer more.
Headphone Scoring (v3): Accessories / Earpads / Eartips (10 pts): 2 Cable (10 pts): 2 Build Quality/ Design / Comfort (10 pts): 10 Lows (20 pts): 8 Mids (20 pts): 15 Highs (20 pts): 16 Soundstage / Instrument Separation / Imaging (10 pts): 8 Total: 61 -
Symphonium Meteor
Meteor goes BOOM!
Pros: Great bass
Great looks
Awesome accessories
Good fitCons: OK cable
Not the most detailed
Not the best resolutionOverview:
Up for review today is the Symphonium Meteor. Symphonium is a relatively new player to the IEM game, and this is only their second IEM – the cheaper option at only $600 instead of $1k. That doesn’t mean it’s any less impressive than its bigger brother, just different. The Meteor uses a 4 BA driver setup. I personally think the Meteor is one of the best IEMs under $1k, especially for bass – but ymmv. On with the review!
Accessories/Earpads/Eartips (10/10):
The Meteor is an example of exactly what I want to see an IEM come with – at a bare minimum. Not only are there multiple ear tips, but there’s also a bag I’ll never use, but it looks cool, a box to hold everything, a foam-lined case inside the box for the IEMs and cable, a sticker, and a nice little note from the company. The stock ear tips are good, and so are the Spinfit W1s for this IEM. Everything matches the Meteor theme and is really nice.
Cable (8/10):
The cable that comes with this is OK. It’s clearly a decent 3.5mm copper cable, but it can get tangly and does have some memory retention. Those are the only downsides – it’s not the best stock cable and it’s nowhere near the worst, and definitely above average. That said, I preferred the Kinera Leyding’s balanced 4.4mm preferable to the stock cable. You can also get the cable now in 4.4mm, so that’s cool.
Build Quality/Comfort (10/10):
I really don’t like the color Red. However, I absolutely love the Meteor’s aesthetics. The tiny meteors on the faceplate just look amazing, though I wish they’d release a white version with tiny red meteors, or a black version with red meteors – that’d be even better. Nonetheless, the Meteor looks great and feels really durable.
Not only does it look cool, but the Meteor is also tiny, especially compared to its bigger brother. They fit quite easily in my ears and are very comfortable.
Sound:
Take a look at the squig.link below. You can clearly see how much bass these have compared to their mids. That’s one of the main claims of the Meteor – BASS. It does a good job of delivering on that promise, almost too much at times. Compared to the EJ07, the Meteor has more bass, and more recessed high-mids/low-highs. I am powering these from my Shanling M6 Ultra with the balanced jack at 45-50/100 volume – these are TOUGH to power compared to quite a few other IEMs.
Lows (15/20):
I’m starting off with the Mid-bass/Sub-bass test I’m using David Guetta’s “I’m Good (Blue).” To no one’s surprise, these are super bassy IEMs. The impact in the intro kicks REALLY hard with a tiny bit of bloat, but not a ton. The sub-bass roars in the background and almost blots out the
sunmids. If you love bass/sub-bass, these are going to make you very happy at half the price of the MEST Mk2. They are bassy AF and it’s good quality bass too, not just quantity (but definitely quantity.) This is a 9/10 on the bass quality/quantity points (I’m trying to be more transparent on my scoring.)Up next is Demon Hunter’s “I Am A Stone,” which I use to test whether the bass is too strong and overwhelms the mids as that is just as important as how strong/good the bass is. Yeah, unsurprisingly, the bass overwhelms the strings and vocals here. You can still hear them, but the bass is so strong that it is actually more to the forefront than the mids are, which is not my preference, but it may be yours. It’s not the worst I’ve heard (Kennerton), so about 5/10 points here.
Mids (14/20):
Weaving The Fate’s “The Fall” is my test song for clean/dirty guitars and vocals with background instruments to see how clearly the vocals can be heard. The intro guitars sound good – if a tad muddy. The distorted guitars sound pretty good, though quite muddy/distorted. The vocals sound really good here with a somewhat forward presentation, but the words are clear and don’t sound too far away in the soundstage. Overall, this is a solid presentation of this song, if not the best, and I appreciate the full-body feeling of the song on the Meteor. 4/6 points here.
Staind’s “Something to Remind You” has clean electric guitars and wonderful vocals – this song tests vocal quality and background noise. The song sounds really good – if a bit blurry/distorted. The Meteor is not the clearest IEM on the market, nor is it the most detailed. It is a nice warm-sounding IEM though and the bass guitar in the background can, of course, be clearly heard. I still really like how this sounds, though it won’t give me chills like the EJ07 did here. 6/7 points here.
To test classical instruments in the mids, I’m using The Piano Guys’ “Code Name Vivaldi.” Of course, the bass-string instruments come in strongly in the intro. A little too strong, as they overwhelm the piano that ends up feeling very distant. There is some definite muddiness here with the lower instruments blurring together into a single sound instead of being separate. When the bass gets out of the way, the mids shine through quite nicely, though still with that fuzzy veil. Also, the piano can be quite good when given the chance to shine. 4/7 points here
Highs (16/20):
To test sibilance on headphones I use Panic! At The Disco’s “High Hopes. The Meteor somehow avoids most of the sibilance on this song – there is still some, but it’s surprisingly muted. The song itself also sounds more full than it does on the EJ07. Due to the amount of sibilance here, the Meteor earns 4/6 points here.
Dream Theater’s “The Alien,” is the highs test song I use to see if the cymbals/high-hats/snare drum can be clearly heard and distinguished from the rest of the music (also good for instrument separation.) The Meteor does surprisingly well here considering how bassy it is. While not top-tier, you get a lot more cymbals and high-hat on these than you will on a lot of other headphones, including full-size headphones. 6/7 points here.
Michelle McLaughlin’s “Across The Burren” is another of my favorite highs/sharpness test songs as it can easily sound painful on some headphones. I’m expecting a little sharpness here, but really don’t get any until 0:38. Then, there is a little bit, but the overall presentation here is extremely well done and better than a lot of top-tier IEMs I’ve heard. 6/7 points here. An overall surprising rendition from the Meteor.
Soundstage/Instrument Separation/Imaging (6/10):
I use MGMT’s “Time to Pretend” to test soundstage, instrument separation, and imaging. The soundstage is pretty decent, but not mind-blowing. Instrument separation is somewhat mid-tier with more blending of instruments than I’d like, and imaging is just alright – you’re not getting a full 3D with these. 6/10 points here.
Comparisons:
I already wrote a comparison between this and the more expensive EJ07. The Meteor is solid competition for the EJ07 for $300 less (that said, I know people who have gotten the Meteor and hated it, so as usual, everyone has different tastes.) If you want more bass, more treble presence, and a bigger soundstage with more instrument separation and imaging than the EJ07, at the expense of clarity and detail, the Meteor is a better fit for you. You will get more bass bloat and lower bass quality with increased bass quantity and it will overwhelm the mids sometimes. The Meteor just comes across as more distorted than the EJ07, which is very clear. Also, the fit might not be for everyone since the nozzles are pretty small and it’s harder to get a good seal with the Meteor. You could also just get the Final A5000 if you want to pay half as much as the Meteor and don’t need the bass, or even the Truthear HEXA for only $80.
Conclusion:
This is my second pair of these and I recommended them to someone on Head-Fi as a good cheap-ish bass IEM. They hated it and preferred their Raptgo Hook X, so really, get them or don’t get them – I couldn’t care less (I don’t work for you, and I’ve made $0 reviewing stuff.) I like how they sound and I love how they look, and I don’t even like red. They have some fantastic bass if you love bass, just understand that they aren’t detail monsters and they have some fuzziness to them you won’t get on colder, more analytical, less fun IEMs. Know your preference and go with what you like!
Headphone Scoring (v3): Accessories / Earpads / Eartips (10 pts): 10 Cable (10 pts): 6 Build Quality/ Design / Comfort (10 pts): 10 Lows (20 pts): 15 Mids (20 pts): 14 Highs (20 pts): 16 Soundstage / Instrument Separation / Imaging (10 pts): 6 Total: 77 -
JH Audio ROX
Awesome Bass Control
Pros: Change the bass to whatever you like
Awesome bass
Solid Highs
Solid Mids
Great price usedCons: A little muddy
Cable is proprietary
There’s a newer versionOverview:
Up for review today is the Jerry Harvey Audio ROX, which I got in a trade. This is not the same as the ROXANNE I guess, but possibly an older version – the new version has the full name written out on the faceplate. I can’t find anything on the ROX except on a Hong Kong website where they sell for approximately $1,650. The newer one has 12 drivers per side, though I have no idea if the ROX has the same tech or not in it. It’s a bit of an enigma. So, there’s no point in recounting the newer model’s specs here because it may not even be the same model. Regardless, it’s probably close and likely shares the same DNA as the ROXANNE. Anyway, you only really care about how it sounds anyway right?
Accessories/Earpads/Eartips (6/10):
Mine were definitely a used pair, so some of the accessories were missing. What the ROX should come with is a custom Flygirl hard case, a tiny screwdriver, a wax tool, and a sticker…and that’s it. Oh, and probably some ear tips as well. Overall, it’s not the worst accessory pack I’ve ever seen, but it’s definitely not the best either – that honor is still shared between the Elysium and the Mezzo LE. The ROX earns 6 points here. I used both my Spinfit W1 and my Final Audio E Type tips with these – I definitely recommend the E types, though both worked just fine.
Cable (7/10):
The cable is tangly, has a proprietary 4-pin design, and are 3.5mm only. Built into that cable is a cool bass-tune feature that only works with the stock cable. So, if you want a new cable, you’d have to contact JH to get a new one, I believe they make them in 4.4mm termination now. You can also get 2-pin and 8-pin on the IEM side – whatever that is. THAT’S A LOT OF PINS! The cable screws into the top so you won’t accidentally tug on the cable and pull it out – a very nice feature. The bass-tune feature is definitely the coolest part about these and lets you adjust from almost no bass to tons of bass – much more effective than a stupid switch on the IEM that slightly changes… nothing. That said, it’s not what I’d call an amazing cable, and if I had the option to use a different cable like the Kinera Leyding or Ace – I would in a heartbeat.
Build Quality/Comfort (8/10):The build quality is good. The IEMs appear to be solid acrylic throughout the entire body, with metal pieces inserted inside for the tubes and the cable connector. These don’t look like they’re going to break easily, chip, or scratch – they’re definitely made for the professional. And, while I don’t LOVE the cable, it’s built tough.
These don’t sit in your ears, they stick out of them quite far, which actually makes for a pretty comfortable fit as long as you have good ear tips on them. They also have the skinniest nozzles I’ve ever seen, which is great for people with tiny ear holes, but makes for a weird experience for everyone else (sorry Josh.) If you hate IEMs sitting inside your ear, or you have weirdly shaped ears, then JH IEMs are made for you – they’re designed to fit in everyone’s ears since they’re built for bands on the road touring. So, just expect a long, skinny nozzle and it sticking out of your ear a bit and you’ll be good. I find them to be quite comfortable as they don’t touch my ear anywhere unlike the Elysium.
Sound:
Check out the Frequency Response Graph below to see how much of a difference the bass tuning makes with these IEMs. I have these turned up to about 2/3rds of the way up, all the way up was WAY too much bass for me, but 2/3rds was perfect. Also, these are super easy to drive with volume at 40-45/100 on UNBALANCED – awesome. I’m driving these from my Shanling M6 Ultra using Tidal Hifi and the stock cable.
Lows (20/20):
I’m starting off with the Mid-bass/Sub-bass test I’m using David Guetta’s “I’m Good (Blue).” Obviously, the bass is going to be good here since you can adjust it to whatever you like. The impact from the intro bass drums is great and the sub-bass at 0:38 is also really good, both in quality and in quantity. These IEMs are a cheat-mode for bass. Not enough bass? Turn it up! It gets to AHHH levels of bass. Too much bass? Turn it down – though it’ll never hit no bass at all.
Up next is Demon Hunter’s “I Am A Stone,” which I use to test whether the bass is too strong and overwhelms the mids as that is just as important as how strong/good the bass is. At 2/3rds on the bass adjust, this song is just about as perfect as I’ve ever heard. The bass doesn’t overwhelm the mids like the Meteor can – but once again, you can make the bass overwhelm here if you want. Yeah, it’s a gimmick, but it’s a really cool one and I’ll give the ROX max points on bass here because it’s not just adjustable, it’s good.
Mids (14/20):
Weaving The Fate’s “The Fall” is my test song for clean/dirty guitars and vocals with background instruments to see how clearly the vocals can be heard. You can’t adjust how the mids are going to sound, so the question here is can they keep up with the ROX’s bass? Honestly, they’re a little muddy/veiled. These are not $3k+ IEMs, and the vocals still sound good, but both the clean and distorted guitars sound like they’re coming in from behind some foam. The vocals do this a tad as well, but not to the same level. They’re above average, but not by a ton – 3/6 points here.
Staind’s “Something to Remind You” has clean electric guitars and wonderful vocals – this song tests the vocal quality and background noise. This is quite a bit better than the previous song. Yeah, there’s still a tad bit of a veil, but the entire range of this song sounds better, definitely above average. The only place it gets a bit muddy is when Aaron Lewis sings low notes, which is a common problem with this song, and one of the reasons I use it. The bass guitar sounds really good though and doesn’t overwhelm the mids. 6/7 points
To test classical instruments in the mids, I’m using The Piano Guys’ “Code Name Vivaldi.” The intro strings come in nicely, but not the best I’ve heard. The bass-string instruments come in hard and sound really nice. I actually had to turn the bass down to ½ for this song to prevent it from overwhelming the rest of the instruments. It works really nicely there. Yes, there’s still a little bit of fuzz on here and it’s not the best I’ve ever heard this song, but it’s pretty good and better than quite a few. 5/7 points here.
Highs (15/20):
To test sibilance on headphones I use Panic! At The Disco’s “High Hopes. There’s a bit of sibilance on this song, which is a little surprising based on the FRG, which shows a hard drop in those frequencies. That said, it’s better than most and not offensive unless you’re listening for it. 5/6 points here.
Dream Theater’s “The Alien,” is the highs test song I use to see if the cymbals/high-hats/snare drum can be clearly heard and distinguished from the rest of the music (also good for instrument separation.) I’m a bit surprised here since I can actually hear the cymbals and snares quite clearly despite the treble dip, though it’s not quite top-notch treble, it’s definitely better than the EJ07. Yet another good showing from the ROX – 5/7 points to
GryffindorJH Audio.Michelle McLaughlin’s “Across The Burren” is another of my favorite highs/sharpness test songs as it can easily sound painful on some headphones. There’s a bit of sharpness here, but not enough to make me stop listening to the song like on some headphones. I also had to turn down the song to 33/100 on the volume, which helped with the sharpness. So, again not a bad treble showing, and none of the treble pieces had the fuzziness that I saw on the mids – an overall good presentation and 5/7 points to the ROX.
Soundstage/Instrument Separation/Imaging (4/10):
I use MGMT’s “Time to Pretend” to test soundstage, instrument separation, and imaging. This is definitely a weakness of the ROX. The soundstage feels low-mid range in size. The instrument separation is mid-tier and very 2D sounding, and the imaging is just OK. The ROX only earns a 4/10 here as it is just below average across the board.
Comparisons:
This is a challenging comparison section to write since the only other IEM I have with the bass-tune tech built into the cable is also made by JH Audio. Both the 16V2 and ROX measure pretty similarly on the FRG, so it’s no surprise that they sound pretty close. The main differences are: almost nothing. The bass is basically the same, the fit is basically the same, and the looks are basically the same. The 16v2 comes with a thicker cable in silver rather than black. The tuning differences are minuscule and aren’t really worth mentioning – check out the FRG if you want to know how they’ll sound with your specific preferences.
Conclusion:
The JH Audio ROX is a surprise since I’d never heard of JH Audio until just recently. They’re focused more on the professional audio crowd since they were originally created for Van Halen by John Harvey. The ROX brings a fun tuning with surprisingly good treble and a fun bass-tune gimmick to the consumer market. If you love bass, or just want the ability to turn it up or down as needed, don’t mind the mids being a little fuzzy, and like decent treble with just a tad of sharpness/sibilance, then the ROX should definitely be on your wish list. These really do compete in the $1,000+ range and the bass control is not just a gimmick – a 74 is a good score from me and only 12 points under my top IEM.
Headphone Scoring (v3): Accessories / Earpads / Eartips (10 pts): 6 Cable (10 pts): 7 Build Quality/ Design / Comfort (10 pts): 8 Lows (20 pts): 20 Mids (20 pts): 14 Highs (20 pts): 15 Soundstage / Instrument Separation (10 pts): 4 Total: 74 -
Vision Ears Elysium
What the Bass?!
Pros: Great Bass – read the review
Excellent Mids
Awesome packaging
Great accessories
Nice cableCons: 2.5mm cable
Mine are not normal Elysiums
A little unwanted bass reverb
Sharpness in highsOverview:
Up for review today is the spiritual upgrade to the Vision Ears VE8 (completely different layout), the VE Elysium. Yes, there’s another, more expensive, version of this that comes in purple. That one supposedly has more bass, though I’ve never heard it and it only comes in purple, which just really isn’t a color I’d spend $3,000 on. The Elysium retail for $2,280 and I see no real reason to get the Barney ones over the really nice-looking blue and green ones. That said, some people LOVE the EXT, so I’ll have to reserve final judgment until I actually hear the EXT (feel free to send me a pair.) I received these in a trade.
The Elysium has a High Precision Acoustic Leveling Chamber (HALC) which finely tunes the DD for the highest accuracy – their words, not mine. Other than that, it comes with a single BA driver for the lows, a DD for the mids, and two electrostatics for the highs (I think, VE’s own site doesn’t really tell you.) Odd to see BA for the lows and DD for the mids, but VE has tuned it to sound amazing either way. More about that later, on with the review!
Accessories/Earpads/Eartips (10/10):
Wow. The box that opens like something out of a sci-fi novel is really cool. I half expected some sort of gas or dry ice to come out to fill the room with smoke upon opening it. Yes, the center DOES rise up when you open it. Easily my top 2 unboxing experiences ever. The flap on the right contains all the ear tips, etc., while you can lift out the top to reveal the bottom goodies. On the bottom, there is a really nice BLUE case and a baggie I’d never use. Still, this easily deserves top points for accessories even though shipping that heavy box to the person that buys these from me is going to suck.
The stock included ear tips are really nice and match the aesthetic of the IEMs. No complaints here. I’m using the Spinfit W1s because stock ear tips on used IEMs gross me out (Here if you want a pair: https://amzn.to/3T1IX0s.) I have to admit. The W1s barely fit on the Elysium – these are the largest nozzles I think I’ve ever encountered. Ever. They make the Aroma Thunder’s nozzles seem small. So, small-ear people stay away – more on that in comfort. That said, I can get the W1s fit on here and they still give great isolation and seal FWIW.
Cable (8/10):
I don’t have much of a cable rant on this one because the cable that comes with the Elysium is pretty nice. It’s flexible, doesn’t have much memory retention, is a nice silver-plated copper, and comes with a balanced connection. The only problem is that the balanced connection is 2.5mm. Who sends their cable with a 2.5mm? Seriously? 4.4mm is far more common, and I’d even rather have a 3.5mm. Nothing else I have uses 2.5mm and only the A&K SP3k DAP (which runs $3,600) has a 2.5mm that I’ve used. Way to buck the trend of usable connectors VE. At least make it modular if not 4.4mm. So, I can’t use it with the very nice stock cable – instead, I’m using the Kinera Leyding (the best aftermarket cable I own – feel free to send me a better one: you can buy the Leyding here if you want one: https://amzn.to/3L3l0Eh.)
Build Quality/Comfort (9/10):
Classic VE German build quality. Everything just exudes good built quality. The clear shells show off the inside circuitry and it is a very cool look. I also love the metallic green and blue foil built into the shells. Top-notch workmanship.
I find these comfortable, but I have larger ears. The shell itself fits inside your ears, without sticking out at all. If you want something that protrudes more for more comfort, grab the JH Audio 16v2 or ROX. If you have small ears, these will not fit in them since they fit pretty snuggly in mine. I can wear these for long periods of time without any issues, but seriously, don’t grab a pair if you have small ears.
Sound:
There’s some weirdness going on the with Elysium Frequency Response Graph. According to my test system, the Elysium have the most bass of any IEM I’ve ever tested. More than the UM MEST Mk2. More than the Meteor and Zero. That’s weird, especially since the point of the EXT is to add MORE bass to the Elysium. I’ve remeasured the Elysium close to 10 times with different sides, different tips, different tip insertion depths, etc. and there’s been no change. Sooo…yeah, not sure what’s up with the Elysium measurements. Other people have completely different graphs for theirs. Mine looks nothing like theirs and I wonder if mine is some sort of pre-release version of the EXT – no clue, but as always with measurements, take it with a grain of salt.
Here’s how it should look:
I somehow ended up with an Elysium that combines the low-end of the EXT with the highs of the Elysium – wicked.
I am powering these off both the Shanling M6 Ultra (M6U) and the A&K SP3000 (SP3K.) On the M6U, I’m using the 4.4mm balanced connection with low gain and volume at around 45/100. On the SP3K, I’m using the 4.4mm balanced connection on low gain with the volume at around 80/150. Both are running off Tidal Hi-Fi with MQA enabled.
Lows (17/20):
I’m starting off with the Mid-bass/Sub-bass test I’m using David Guetta’s “I’m Good (Blue).” The impact is solid, though with a touch of unwanted reverb (like the Thunder has) and the sub-bass has a really good rumble. You can even hear the sub-bass wind up in the background before it starts – pretty rare to hear that with most IEMs. The mids come in really clearly here and aren’t overwhelmed by the bass or shoved to the back. It’s an excellent bass presentation and I can see why the FRG shows it with lots of bass – these are not what I was expecting. 8/10.
Up next is Demon Hunter’s “I Am A Stone,” which I use to test whether the bass is too strong and overwhelms the mids as that is just as important as how strong/good the bass is. The bass instruments in the back are very well represented and while they overwhelm the mids a little, the mids still come through really strongly – enough that I’m only taking off a point on these. 9/10.
Mids (19/20):
Weaving The Fate’s “The Fall” is my test song for clean/dirty guitars and vocals with background instruments to see how clearly the vocals can be heard. Both the clean and dirty guitars are good. There’s no fuzziness to either – it’s a really good representation. The vocals are perfect and not pushed to the back at all. I have no complaints here, even the bass guitar can be heard clearly. 6/6.
Staind’s “Something to Remind You” has clean electric guitars and wonderful vocals – this song tests vocal quality and background noise. Wow, once again, no complaints here. The vocals are great, the guitars are great, and the bass guitar doesn’t drown out anything else. You can hear the fingers moving across the strings here, so some people might find that annoying, but I appreciate the level of detail and it’s not loud enough to distract me. 7/7.
To test classical instruments in the mids, I’m using The Piano Guys’ “Code Name Vivaldi.” The bass-string instruments come in strongly in the into until the mid-strings sort of push them to the back a bit. Everything is very clear and detailed. The piano sounds excellent along with everything else. I’m only taking a point off here because it doesn’t sound quite as magical as it has on some headphones previously – a bit more clinical than musical. 6/7.
Highs (13/20):
To test sibilance on headphones I use Panic! At The Disco’s “High Hopes. Ouch. Painful sibilance. I switched between both DAPs on this song to see if it was just the SP3K since it can add some sharpness with its more neutral tone. Nope, there’s sibilance on both, but it is more tolerable on the M6U – barely. Not a fan here, which likely bodes well for the next song. 1/6.
Dream Theater’s “The Alien,” is the highs test song I use to see if the cymbals/high-hats/snare drum can be clearly heard and distinguished from the rest of the music (also good for instrument separation.) The cymbals in the background here can clearly be heard, but each individual strike is not portrayed like on some others. It’s definitely above average, but the cymbals do blur together a little bit and the separation I want to see isn’t there. 5/7.
Michelle McLaughlin’s “Across The Burren” is another of my favorite highs/sharpness test songs as it can easily sound painful on some headphones. There’s really no sharpness on this song. The piano is beautifully represented with no unwanted notes or harshness popping up. This is just about perfect somehow. I didn’t expect that after the previous two songs – an absolute enigma. 7/7.
Soundstage/Instrument Separation/Imaging (7/10):
I use MGMT’s “Time to Pretend” to test soundstage, instrument separation, and imaging. The soundstage is large, but not quite Epic like the MM. The instrument separation is good, but not TOTL level, there is a little bleed-together – the MM wins here again. Imaging is good, though again not at the MM level. Overall, a good, but not amazing presentation. 7/10.
Comparisons:
The BCD gives the MM an unfair advantage. While it shows low bass levels on the FRGs, the MM has a ton of bass, in fact, that extra bass is the reason I took off a couple of points from it because it overwhelms the mids on some songs. It’s a bit cleaner than my weird Elysium, and just a touch stronger as well. Both IEMs have really excellent mids, though the MM definitely beats the Elysium on Soundstage/Instrument Separation/Imaging. Both have excellent detail and clarity. The MM has better highs than the Elysium and less sharpness. Keep in mind that the Elysium costs half as much as the Mentor and it matters far less. The Elysium has a nicer unboxing experience than the MM (somehow) and the stock cable is less microphonic. Overall, these are both great and you can’t go wrong with either, but the MM is still slightly better across the board – and it’s that extra 5-10% that makes all the difference in this hobby.
Conclusion:
OK, so I have a weird Elysium. I know, so take this entire review with a grain of salt – though I’d like to think the mids are just as good regardless. The Elysium shouldn’t have that much bass. Maybe it’s a test rig issue (that only happens on the Elysium) and maybe I just have a unique Elysium or a prototype EXT. No clue. That’s the fun thing about trades, you never know what you’ll get. What I do know is that this Elysium is potentially the bassiest Elysium out there and it sounds really good. Not brand-new flagship good, but it’s not the Phonix, and it doesn’t cost anywhere near as much either. This should be in everyone’s top 5 – though I have no idea how the normal Elysium bass is.
Headphone Scoring (v3): Accessories / Earpads / Eartips (10 pts): 10 Cable (10 pts): 8 Build Quality/ Design / Comfort (10 pts): 9 Lows (20 pts): 17 Mids (20 pts): 19 Highs (20 pts): 13 Soundstage / Instrument Separation (10 pts): 7 Total: 83 -
iBasso DX240 W/ AMP 8 Mk2
Great Warm Sound – Awful Case/Software
Pros: Great, warm sound with AMP 8
Light weight
Good screen
Usable buttons
Balanced output
Swappable ampsCons: Terrible software
Terrible stock case
Not as good as the M6UOverview:
Up for review today is the iBasso DX240 DAP (https://amzn.to/3ymWk21) with the AMP 8 installed (https://amzn.to/3Yv8ErF.) I picked this one in trade, so I have no impressions on the stock amp – and the AMP8 is widely considered the best amp available with this. The DX240 comes with the Qualcomm 660, which is a bit behind the more modern 665 you’ll see on newer players and it also comes with the older Android 9 + the proprietary Mango OS. Supposedly, you can switch between the two. It also has 4GB of RAM with 64GB of onboard storage. The DX240 comes with the ES9038PRO “Flagship DAC,” which is only kind of a flagship depending on who you ask, it seems pretty capable to me. It also has swappable AMP Cards obviously, with a 5” screen, MQA 16x, 5G Wi-Fi, Bluetooth 5.0, USB 3.1, an SD card slot with up to 2 TB, Quick Charge, PCM 32 Bit/768kHz native DSD512, and freaking Coaxial Outputs for some reason! That’s a lot of goodness packed into one, though the most modern DAPs have upgrades across the board with Qualcomm 665 chips and android 12 , etc. now. Swappable amps is still something of a unique capability, and the one that makes this great – on with the review!
Build Quality / Design / Specs (18/20):
The DAP itself is of really good quality with a nice aluminum build quality and weight. The knob on it is nice a notchy when spinning with a good click when you press it. The only downside there is that it protrudes and that makes it easy to accidentally hit when you’re putting it in your pocket. There are no indicator lights or anything else on the player. The stock amp has 2.5mm/4.4mm balanced and a 3.5mm unbalanced output while the amp 8 has just the 4.4mm and 3.5mm. The back just appears to be plastic, so that’s disappointing when the M6U comes with an all-aluminum shell for the same price. The benefit here is light weight though, which is good for a portable DAP.The DX240 also bypasses SRC system wide, which allows you to skip the android sample rates and get much better sound. The 4400mAh battery allows for 11 hours of playback, likely on the unbalanced load, so slightly behind the Shanling M6 Ultra (M6U.) It weights 205g, which is crazy light. The balanced port put outputs at 878mW@32ohms while the unbalanced puts out 281mW@32ohms. That’s pretty great and can drive a lot of full-size headphones like the LCD-X on my desk. AMP 8 puts out even more power – 2000mA! I really have nothing to complain about here, the specs are really good.
Accessories (15/20):
Let’s start off with the good. The DX240 comes with a multitude of cables, charging cables, connection cables, etc. They’re good quality and better than most DAPs comes with. Major win. And, it even comes with a case! Too bad that case is absolute crap. I don’t say that lightly, it’s one of those terrible clear TPU cases that you can get of Amazon for your phone for $4 (https://amzn.to/3T0aHD0 for example, though this looks nicer than the one that comes with it.) It picks up finger prints like it’s going out of style, it doesn’t hold its shape, and it feels SUPER cheap (see photos.) It makes the nice DX240 feel like a cheap POS. I honestly prefer Shanling not including a case and making you buy the $40 case over this case. Seriously, I’d rather pay $40 extra than touch the stock DX240 case – it’s not something that should come with a $100 DAP, not even a $400 one. Just…don’t include one, this is beneath you iBasso.
Software / Setup / Ease of Use (3/20):
Gross. Compared to the M6U’s stock Android, with the Google Play Store, the APK back loader on the DX240 is terrible. And maybe it’s possible to somehow link your streaming service through the stock player, but I couldn’t figure it out. If you’re using this with your own files, cool, it should be fine, but downloading Tidal was a PITA. I had to update it like 4 times, it kept saying I had trash on my system, and the APK back loader had Ads! ADs on a product you just spend almost $1k on! Nothing screams Made in China like freeware.
Overall, the Shanling is a much better experience. So is the SP3000 (no ads.) Once you get everything set up, it works fine, and will MQA just fine as well, but man, that was a frustrating 30 minutes to an hour. The built-in player works well, without any real issues, and Tidal works like Tidal once you get it installed. It’s one of the worst setup experiences I’ve ever encountered though, and I hope the new ones fix that issue.
Performance / Sound (18/20):
The sound of the iBasso with AMP 8 is warm, bassy, and inviting. That said, it is definitely more bloated than the M6U. There’s less resolution and more unwanted reverberation from the bass. There are some serious perks to this type of presentation. You don’t get the sharpness that the SP3000 can present sometimes. And there’s nothing painful about the music coming out of the DX240. Now, I haven’t listened to the stock amp, but everything I’ve read implies that the AMP 8 is an overall improvement over the more detailed, and less warm sound that AMP 1 provides. I really like the laid-back performance of the DX240 with AMP 8. It doesn’t seem to lose much detail and there is no real lessening of the mids or highs either. I actually preferred the sound of this with the Multiverse Mentor over the SP3000 on some songs. That’s saying a lot for a 3x price difference. It does have a tad bit of muddiness in the bass though that could use some tightening up, and that’s about it.
Comparisons / Price (15/20):
The fact that I think this competes with the $3,600 SP3000 means that it earns good comparison and price scores. The only downside is that the M6U can do the same thing without an extra $200+ amp that’s sold separately. Also, the M6U doesn’t have that bass bloat that the DX240 with AMP 8 has. The M6U and SP3000 also feel more premium and the stock DX240 case would make it lose points if I hadn’t already taken points off for it previously (that case SUCKS, but at least it came with one.) I also hugely prefer the M6U’s interface, though the SP3000’s is almost as annoying as the DX240s. At least the SP3000 doesn’t have ads on its APK downloaded – so tacky. So overall, I put the DX240 just slightly behind the M6U across the board.
Conclusion:
The DX240 is a really good-sounding DAP that just so happens to need to a $200+ amp to sound its best. The M6U is better sounding, but not as warm, with MUCH better build quality. I’d still take it over the 3x more expensive SP3000, but that’s just my preference. Some people love the SP3000, and some people like the DX240 more than the M6U. Go with what you like. If you want a warmer, semi-decently priced DAP with Android, it’s hard to be mad at the DX240 – just get a new case.
Wolfhawk’s Rating: 69/100
-
Questyle CMA Fifteen
One of the best, but at what cost?
Pros: Great Sound
Nice Remote
Lots of inputs and outputs
Compact-ish
Sturdy, good looksCons: Price
No USB B cable included – for why?Overview:
Up for review today is the Questyle Current Mode Amplification (CMA) Fifteen (not 15.) This was sent to me by Todd at Todd The Vinyl Junkie, from https://www.ttvjaudio.com/. This is a loaner only, designed to make me want to spend $2,799.00 on one of these. I mean…mission accomplished Todd, this is a compact and amazing-sounding DAC/amp all-in-one. The price is certainly a bit prohibitive, but if you can afford it, this is a really good-sounding DAC/amp.
Build Quality / Design / Specs (18/20):
The build quality is excellent and feels like multiple plates of aluminum put together into a DAC/amp box. It’s a bit large horizontally, but far smaller than my Cocktail Audio HA500H. It’s really well built, but picks up fingerprints like it’s going out of style (I know because the previous person who reviewed this left them everywhere (bleh.) The bias control switch appears to do nothing. Literally, nothing, so that’s odd. I can switch it on in the middle of playing music and nothing changes. The function switch changes the CMA 15 from a DAC/amp to just a DAC if you want to power it with some more different amp. This only seems necessary if you need nuclear power plant levels of power – it’s plenty powerful on its own.
The overall design is good if you like black monolithic boxes made from aluminum with orange glowy lights. Admittedly, I prefer the looks of the Headamp GS-X mini, etc. since you can pick a color other than black. The blue on those is fantastic and I wish more companies moved away from everything being black – it’s not an attractive product, just functional.
The CMA Fifteen comes with just about all of the specs you could possibly need from a DAC/amp (except a tube amp.) 32bit/768k output? Check. LDAC Bluetooth connection? Check. Apple Music Lossless? Check. Balanced 4.4mm and 4-pin XLR? Check. MQA? CHECK! DSD?! CHECK-aroonie. There are a ton of inputs and outputs as well. It will also preamp for you, hook up to your powered speakers, and it has ugly orange LEDs as well (and one cool blue one for MQA, which should be magenta.) Oh, and a TON of power – it has that too. I have it powering my JM Audio XTC-Os from the 4-pin balanced jack at 2/10 volume. There is no gain control, so you get what you get. Possibly even Susvara power levels here. It’s only 2W at 32 ohms, but it feels MUCH more powerful than that. It feels more powerful than the Burson Conductor’s 6W of power, even if it’s not (on paper.)
Accessories (5/20):
Not great. The remote is really nice, but the only other thing it comes with is a power cable. That’s it. A remote and a power cable. What is with companies selling something for crazy money and not including any accessories? The $450 Topping DX5 (Here) comes with tons of accessories, heck, the Burson Conductor 3XP comes with more accessories than that at $1,400 retail. Yet the Cocktail Audio HA500H and the Questyle CMA Fifteen come with a remote and a power cable and nothing else. Oh, my bad, it does come with a Mini-CD. Yes, those things that are half the size of a regular CD, that no one has placed in their computer for the last 10 years (who still has a CD drive?) – way to stay in tune with technology Questyle (USB drives are really cheap now.) That’s it. But WAIT! Cable Rant.CABLE RANT!!! Yes, a power cable is important to include with your product. Do you know what else is important to include? A cable to connect to your computer. No one uses USB B cables anymore, except in the audio world for some reason. Very few people just have one laying around because printers, the only thing that ever really used USB B cables, are all wireless now! So not including one is a cardinal sin in my opinion. Luckily, I had an extra one laying around from a printer I got YESTERDAY…which I use wirelessly. So, I didn’t have to pull the one off my HA500H, which also did not come with one. At least the Burson Conductor 3XP came with a USB C cable (a common connection type in the 2020s), though it was the shortest cable ever (1.5ft.) Do you know what came with a good-length cable intended for use with it? The $450 Topping DX5! Add a USB B cable – it’s not hard, and not expensive, and it won’t annoy your customer when they have to go buy one, especially a crappy one from Best Buy, or a $50 AudioQuest Pearl from Amazon (Here) and wait for it to arrive in a day or two. Cable Rant Complete.
Software / Setup / Ease of Use (20/20):
Best. Ever. I’m not kidding. Maybe it’s because I’ve installed so much other software before from all the DAC/amps I’ve used on this computer for reviews. But, I didn’t have to install anything, it even beats the HA500H’s easy installation and it kicks the crap out of the DX5 and Burson 3XP’s software installation. I literally just plugged the CMA 15 into my computer and selected it as the audio output on Tidal. BOOM! That was it – easiest ever. It also automatically knows when to MQA if you have it set to Exclusive Mode and Software Bypass (which you should do automatically if you have Tidal HiFi.) So yeah, max points here. I have nothing to add, weird – not a single complaint.Performance / Sound (20/20):
Oh yes. It’s really good, and the only real reason to buy this DAC/amp other than the easy install. It sounds fantastic. Running through my test tracks playlist with my JM Audio XTC-Open blows my mind at how good it sounds. There is so much body and soundstage and everything just sounds fantastic. It even sounds a little better than my HA500H. Just…not much better. The CMA Fifteen feels a little bassier, and a little less “thin,” and that’s it. Realistically, all you have to do to change that is turn on the tube on the HA500H and they sound basically the same. Is it worth 2x the price for the CMA Fifteen? No. More on that in the next section, but the reality is that the CMA Fifteen sounds as good as the HA500H, and better than a lot of cheaper options, but probably not good enough that it’s worth the price.
Comparisons / Price (10/20):
Yes, the price. $2,800 is a stupid amount of money. You can get a REALLY nice set of headphones for that much. I’d recommend you do that and get a much cheaper DAC/amp. The Cocktail Audio has everything the CMA Fifteen has, with a tad less power, and no 4.4mm jack. But it’s been on sale for $1,400 for as long as I can remember (normally $2,400.) That’s quite literally 50% of the cost for basically the same performance, but with TUBE technology KYLE! If you want a 4.4mm jack, grab a Shanling M6 Ultra DAP with the money you save by not buying the CMA Fifteen, or an IBasso DX320 – whatever, you do you. Even the Burson Conductor 3XP and the Topping DX5 make a good argument for getting one of them. Yes, the Topping won’t sound as good or have the 4.4mm jack, but it’s 1/6th the price. For most people, it’ll get the job done. The 3XP has a TON more power if you need it, even though the setup is a PAIN and it doesn’t sound quite as good as either the HA500H or the CMA Fifteen. But really, as long as the 1.8W of power is good enough for you, just get the HA500H, it even has a screen. Yes, the HA500H is huge, and it may not fit your system, so there’s that. Also, it’s a relatively unknown company out of Korea, so there’s that. Also, the remote’s not great. But it’s HALF as much – simple math.Conclusion:
This is very simple, if you want the best DAC/amp, get the Chord Dave. It’s like $14,000. It’ll probably make you hear angels on your Susvara. If you have the money, do it. If you want the best under $5k, the CMA Fifteen might just be that, especially if you want to listen to 4.4mm IEMs for some reason on your desktop setup (don’t blow them out.) If you have a Utopia or a Susvara or an Expanse, and you really want to make sure your source is as good as it can get, the CMA Fifteen should be at the top of your list. Realistically though, for half the price, you can get 99% of the performance (and still no USB B cable) from the HA500H.Wolfhawk’s Rating: 73/100
-
Letshuoer EJ07
The Vocals IEM
Pros: Fantastic vocals and clean guitars
Good quality bass
Good quality IEM
Great accessories
Modular cable
Great for folk or instrumental
Bass doesn’t overwhelm the midsCons: Microphonic cable
Mediocre highs
Bass quantity
Clinical tuningOverview:
Up for review today is LETSHUOER’s EJ07 IEM. I feel like I just yelled a lot in that last sentence – hmm. Anyway, this is supposedly their flagship IEM, despite the existence of the more expensive EJ09. I don’t get that, but whatever. The EJ07 retails for $899 from Linsoul or directly from Letshuoer Here for the same price. SOWE is also somehow involved, though I’m not sure how and some of the EJ07 come with SOWE written on the faceplate, which kinda ruins the looks, which must be why they sell for less.
The EJ07 comes with a Quad electrostatic tweeter, a custom 10mm Dynamic Driver, and a dual mid-Balanced Armature driver. The focus of the IEM is detail and clarity and it really does succeed in this mission. It is also built for classical and symphony music – these are not made for your EDM, though they aren’t bad at it either. These are supposedly professional musician IEMS. So, how do they sound?
Accessories/Earpads/Eartips (10/10):
For the price range, the EJ07 comes pretty well-equipped. There is a slew of ear tips in the box, though finding them is a surprise since they are hidden behind a flap in the top of the box. There’s also a modular cable connector for 4.4mm and 3.5mm. It’s more ear tips than I’m used to seeing, and they are good quality tips with lots of options. The box itself is pretty plain other than the large silver S on it. It holds the carrying case snuggly inside, which is a nice-looking leather-ish type case. So, overall, this is one of the better-appointed IEMs I’ve seen, despite the missing brush and replacement filters. This was picked up in a trade, so I’m still going to use my Spinfit W1s because they just work great for my ears and I use them on everything (Here if you want some.)
Cable (5/10):
Please, I beg of you, stop making IEM cables with paracord – it’s SO BAD. I can’t stand the microphonics of this cable, which according to Letshuoer is an upgrade cable. Sure, it’s modular which I love, it’s also 6N OCC copper, which is great, and it has 4 cores, though it’s not braided, so that’s meh. But geez, do audio companies really not realize that paracord is the most microphonic material you could put on the outside of a cable? Sandpaper or velvet are the only things I can think of that would be worse. Every time I moved my head, there was a scraping sound in my ears – I can’t imagine a professional musician using these without going insane or just buying a $20 cable from Linsoul to replace it (Here if you want one.) Good job on it not being tangly or memory retentive, and on it being modular, but the microphonics make it basically unusable. If I was keeping these and needed a modular cable, I’d just buy an extra Kinera Leyding or Ace (Here or Here.) Cable rant complete.
Build Quality/Comfort (10/10):
Good, really good. The faceplates pick up fingerprints like it’s going out of style, but the build quality is fantastic and the single-piece resin is great. The nozzles are somewhat large, but my W1s fit just fine on them if a little tight. The faceplates have small shiny pieces of foil built into them and it’s a cool look, though you never know what colors you’re going to get.
The IEMs are not huge by any stretch, but they are also nowhere near the size of the Symphonium Meteor, which are tiny. The Meteor are actually too small and don’t fit as well in my ears due to the short nozzle. That could just be a me problem, but the EJ07 takes top marks for both build quality and comfort.
Sound:
Looking at the EJ07 and Meteor squig.link, we can clearly see more bass and lower midrange from the Meteor. The mids are pretty similar on paper, though not in actuality, and the highs are similar until 8k when the EJ07 drops it like it’s hot while the Meteor continues on relatively neutral. I will be powering both IEMs with Tidal HiFi from my Shanling M6 Ultra (Here if you want one) with a balanced 4.4mm cable at volume level 32-35/100 for the EJ07 and 47-50/100 for the Meteor (dang that thing is hard to drive.)
Lows (14/20):
Starting off with the Mid-bass/Sub-bass test I’m using David Guetta’s “I’m Good (Blue).” The impact of the bass drums is there, but it feels flat and uninspired with more bass bloat than I’d like. The sub-bass is slightly above average, but nowhere near the levels of the Thunder or Multiverse Mentor (MM), both of which cost a ton more. Still, this is not a bad showing in the under $1k price bracket, but it can’t compete with the Meteor when it comes to bass quantity, though the quality is higher.
Up next is Demon Hunter’s “I Am A Stone,” which I use to test whether the bass is too strong and overwhelms the mids. The EJ07 passes this test with flying colors. The bass is still strong but without overwhelming the voices or other string instruments. This is a very good representation of how strong the bass should be on this song, but still not quite at the W900 level. The Meteor completely overwhelms the mids with its strong bass here.
Mids (15/20):
Weaving The Fate’s “The Fall” is a test song for guitars and vocals. The clean guitars sound really good in the intro, but the distorted guitars sound pretty rough, a bit sharp, and overwhelming. The vocals are forward and sound really good if a little flat. The overall impression here is of a 2D soundstage without a lot of imaging, or instrument separation. Again, not bad for the price range, but not impressive either. Compared to the Meteor, the Meteor sounds a bit better on this song with more breadth and body, though less clean and more distorted.
Staind’s “Something to Remind You” has clean electric guitars and wonderful vocals – this song tests vocal quality and background noise. The EJ07 really excels on this song. The vocals come in clearly and forward with the clean guitars placed nicely in the background. It’s definitely the type of music these were made for. I got chills from this song, which hasn’t happened in a long time. Beautifully done without the bass overwhelming the mids. The only complaint I really have here is a tinge of metallic sound, but that can be a common issue on this song. The Meteor has a warmer presentation of this song without the hint of metallic, but it feels less special as well. The bass can be heard more clearly but doesn’t overwhelm the mids. The vocals are pushed further back on the Meteor and there’s some bass bloat in the lower registers of Aaron’s voice when he goes low.
To test classical instruments in the mids, I’m using The Piano Guys’ “Code Name Vivaldi.” That metallic presentation of the strings returns for the intro here. After that, it disappears and we end up with a solid presentation of this song that won’t offend most people. It’s definitely a colder presentation of the classical instruments than the Meteor provides, but more accurate and clean. It’s like the difference between autotune and a normal person singing. The Meteor is definitely muddier here and the presentation, while warmer, is nowhere near as good as the EJ07.
Highs (12/20):
To test sibilance on headphones I use Panic! At The Disco’s “High Hopes. The EJ07 is OK on sibilance here. It’s not perfect, but it’s above average with just a touch of sharpness. The Meteor is pretty close here, which the freq graph actually shows at well since both are about the same in the 3.5kHz range. Obviously, graphs aren’t everything, so it’s good to listen, but neither IEM gets hard knocks here, and neither is perfect either.
The first highs test song I’ll be using is Dream Theater’s “The Alien,” which I use to test and see if the cymbals/high-hats/snare can be clearly heard and distinguished from the rest of the music. I’d expect the EJ07 to have good treble on this song, and while it’s decent, and you can hear some of the high-hats and symbols, it’s nowhere near the DUNU SA6 or The Aroma Thunder level of treble. I’d almost describe it as the baseline for average. The Blessing 2 even might be better. Heck, the Meteor is slightly better, likely because the highs don’t just fall off after 3k as they do on the EJ07. So, if you love your treble, don’t get the EJ07 – if you hate hearing cymbals, get the EJ07.
Michelle McLaughlin’s “Across The Burren” is another of my favorite highs/sharpness test songs as it can easily sound painful on some headphones. There’s a touch of sharpness to the song here, but it’s nothing horrifying that makes me want to rip the IEMs out of my ear – definitely above average. There is a bit of clangy background noise though I need to mention, so it’s not MM level. That little bit of drop at 3.5kHz on the Meteor helps it even more on this song. It sounds even less harsh and almost perfect. Bravo Symphonium, that’s surprising.
Soundstage/Instrument Separation/Imaging (5/10):
I use MGMT’s “Time to Pretend” to test soundstage, instrument separation, and imaging. The soundstage of the EJ07 is OK, it’s not completely flat, and it’s not MM or Kublai Khan-level of massive. The instrument separation is also middle ground and so is the imaging. A bit underwhelming here, especially since the Meteor is better in all three areas at the expense of clarity, which I’m not testing here.
Comparisons:
The Meteor is a solid competition for $300 less. If you want more bass, more treble presence, and a bigger soundstage with more instrument separation and imaging, at the expense of clarity and detail, the Meteor is a better fit for you. You will get more bass bloat and lower quality with the increased quantity and it will overwhelm the mids sometimes. It just comes across as more distorted than the EJ07, which is very clear. Also, the fit might not be for everyone since the nozzles are pretty small and it’s harder to get a good seal with the Meteor. You could also just get the Final A5000 if you want to pay half as much as the Meteor and don’t need the bass, or even the Truthear HEXA for only $80.
Conclusion:
The EJ07 is an odd duck – and I’m not sure it’s worth the asking price. It isn’t designed for people who like bass, but it doesn’t have the treble you’d expect from a less-bassy headphone. So, less bass, and less treble, but good clarity, and good detail, but a touch of sharpness still in the highs. It’s not how I would have tuned an IEM, but no one has asked me for a collab IEM yet haha. It comes down to your priorities really – are you someone who hates bass bloat, large soundstages, distortion, and highs? Then the wonderful vocals and clean instruments of the EJ07 might be perfect for you. I imagine these are designed for folk and instrumental music (Yes, Gordon Lightfoot and the Beatles sound good with these – so that’s who these are made for.)
Headphone Scoring (v3): Accessories / Earpads / Eartips (10 pts): 10 Cable (10 pts): 5 Build Quality/ Design / Comfort (10 pts): 10 Lows (20 pts): 14 Mids (20 pts): 15 Highs (20 pts): 12 Soundstage / Instrument Separation (10 pts): 5 Total: 71